Track your brand against competitors, measure change over time, and inspect the answers behind every result.
Prompt
Answer
Most coaches point runners to Pacer Athletics and Vello for long mileage weeks…
Brand
Not mentioned
Position
,
Visibility
38%
Checked against the official APIs of every major AI assistant
The shift
A strong Google ranking doesn't tell you whether the assistant answering that same question names two competitors and skips you.
Classic search
runnersworld.com
gearjunkie.com
northwindrunning.com
You rank #3. Your SEO tool calls that a win.
The AI answer
“What are the best running shoes for marathon training?”
For marathon training, most runners land on Pacer Athletics for daily miles and Vello for race day. Both are widely recommended by coaches…
Northwind Running isn't mentioned.
No click. No consideration. And nothing in your analytics tells you.
Visibility OS measures exactly this, across five assistants, every time you run a check.
Five views, one brand, playing through the real screens.
Visibility score
62%
▲ 12 pts vs last 30 days
Share of voice
23%
2nd of 5 brands
Positive sentiment
58%
Across 500 checks
Visibility by AI platform
Every metric is computed from real answers, not estimates, and every one traces back to the response it came from.
The share of AI answers that mention your brand at all.
Where you land when you are mentioned, first pick or afterthought.
How the assistant talks about you: positive, neutral or negative.
Your slice of the category against every competitor you track.
The sources cited in the answers we sampled, and whether yours is one.
How often you're found, and how often you make the shortlist.
68%
Detection
41%
Top 3
No tags to install, no data to import. Paste a domain and Visibility OS does the setup work for you.
Proof, not estimates
Other tools hand you a score. Visibility OS hands you the response it came from, the question asked, the engine that answered, where your brand appeared and which competitors were named alongside it.
Official APIs
Direct calls to each provider. No scraped chat windows, no lookalike models.
Full answers stored
Every check keeps the exact prompt and response, so any number can be audited.
Sources kept
Citations are captured per answer, you see which domains earned the mention.
Prompt
“Which running brands last the longest?”
Answer
Durability leaders in this category are Pacer Athletics, closely followed by Northwind Running, whose outsoles are frequently cited for high mileage in independent testing…
Prompts where a competitor wins and you're missing, ranked by gap.
Engine-specific fixes, weakest engine first.
The follow-up searches an assistant would likely run, generated for your prompt, not observed live.
The domains AI trusts in your category.
Auto-discovered, then tracked in every answer.
Branded PDF and CSV exports, ready to send.
What earns a mention in Perplexity won't earn one in Claude, so every engine is scored separately.
Cites sources inline, so being featured on frequently cited third-party sites is the fastest lever.
Leans on well-indexed, clearly structured pages. Answer common questions directly, in plain language.
Draws on Google's index and Search-linked sources, classic SEO fundamentals carry straight over.
Pulls from real-time conversation on X, an active presence moves visibility here fastest.
Favours established, consistently published sources. A steady publishing record compounds here.
New assistants are added when they start driving real discovery, same rule: official API, full answer stored.
One workspace per client, clean separation, and a month-end report that speaks for itself.
A workspace per client
Separate brands, prompts and reports.
Roles that fit a team
Owners manage billing; the team gets data.
Deliverables, not screenshots
Branded PDF and CSV your client can act on.
Built for speed
⌘K to any brand or page. Dark mode included.
Costs you can see
Real API spend per month, per workspace.
Multi-brand from day one
Up to five brands, each with its own market.
Most “AI visibility” numbers come from scraping a chat window or eyeballing a few answers. Neither survives a client asking how you know.
| Capability | Visibility OSofficial APIs | Scraping toolschat windows | Manual checksask and screenshot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answers from official provider APIs | |||
| Full response stored for every check | |||
| All five assistants in one score | |||
| Position, sentiment and competitor mentions | |||
| Citation leaderboard by domain | |||
| Share of voice vs tracked competitors | |||
| Choose the model tier per engine | |||
| Market-localised prompts (16 countries) | |||
| Actual API spend shown per month | |||
| Repeatable, timestamped history |
Comparison describes common approaches in this category, not any single named product.
Starter
One brand, getting started.
$49/month
or INR 3,999 /month + 18% GST
(INR 4,719 incl. GST)
Pro
Agencies running a couple of client brands.
$129/month
or INR 10,999 /month + 18% GST
(INR 12,979 incl. GST)
Advanced
Agencies scaling a full portfolio.
$299/month
or INR 24,999 /month + 18% GST
(INR 29,499 incl. GST)
A month of credits, roughly: Starter gives about 2 Full runs; Pro gives about 1 Full plus 1 Standard plus small runs; Advanced gives about 1 Full plus 1 Standard plus small runs. Run sizes depend on how many prompts you track.
Free trial: 7 days, 20 credits in total, manual runs only, no card.
No hedging: exactly how the data is collected, and what you get.
How often AI assistants name your brand when someone asks a question in your category, plus where you rank in that answer, how you're described, and which sources the assistant used. Traditional rank tracking can't see any of it.
Be seen. Be considered.
One domain is all it takes. We'll draft your prompts, find your competitors and run your first check across five assistants.